The Tribal Climate Change Guide is part of the Pacific Northwest Tribal Climate Change Project (TCCP). The TCCP is part of the L.I.G.H.T. Foundation (LF), is an independent, Indigenous-led, conservation 501(c)(3) nonprofit established on the Colville Indian Reservation in the traditional territory of the Nespelem Tribe in present-day north central Washington State. LF supports the restoration and cultivation of native Plant and Pollinator Relatives and the culturally respectful conservation of habitats and ecosystems which are climate resilient and adaptive. For more information about LF, visit: https://thepnwlf.org/. For more information about the Tribal Climate Change Project, visit: https://tribalclimate.uoregon.edu/. If you would like to add information to this guide, please email kathy.lynn.or@gmail.com.

 

Tongass Land and Resource Management Plan Amendment: Draft Environmental Impact Statement

Type
Literature
Publication
Stewart. Earl, M. 2015. Tongass Land and Resource Management Plan Amendment: Draft Environmental Impact Statement. USDA Forest Service, Alaska Region, Tongass National Forest
Year Published
2015
Organization
USDA Forest Service
Description

This Draft EIS responds to the Secretary's Memo and the 5-Year Forest Plan Review by analyzing five alternatives for amending the Plan, including the No-Action alternative. A separate document, called the Proposed Land and Resource Management Plan (Forest Plan), has been published with this Draft Environmental Impact Statement to represent the Forest Plan under the preferred alternative (Alternative 5). Alternative 5 is based on Tongass Advisory Committee's underlying principles, general approach, and recommendations. Appendix F displays a side-by-side comparison of the alternatives to show how they differ from the preferred alternative. Four key issues are identified: 1) transitioning to young-growth-based timber management in 10 to 15 years in an ecologically, socially, and economically sustainable manner; 2) promoting the development of renewable energy projects where it is compatible with National Forest purposes; 3) the effects of potential timber harvest activities in roadless areas; and 4) the effects of forest management on wildlife habitat and the Conservation Strategy. The five alternatives provide a range of options for addressing the issues. Direct, indirect, and cumulative effects of the alternatives are compared and disclosed in Chapters 2 and 3, based on inventory data and modeling.

Geography